economy

You are currently browsing articles tagged economy.

George Osborne/serious changes to the British banking system over at Robert Peston’s blog. I quite like George Osborne. Like a lot of the better Tories* he seems to have gone from an idealist to a pragmatist. Because it’s easy in opposition. People who like politicians to have a firm message and not to flip flop, are simple. If you want bold charismatic politics and politicians you get the likes of Tony Blair and George Bush. They did wonders for … something. I can’t think what. All short term gain and fuck all insight into the future.  Faith.  Lol.

* I don’t want to you to think I show any particular bias towards political parties. Politics is the decoration on cakes for morons. A memory filter for the ignorant. What matters is reality. Most politicians know this – know that what they say is dependent on whatever realities are presented to then on the day they take office – but have to spout a load of bollocks so that twats like you, reading your twatty partisan pseudo pamphlets, will vote for them. If you’re not a twat, regard the last line as a comment on search engines.

Tags: , , ,

I was just about to post the following, with something along the lines of “oh, FFS”:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7836941.stm

The most depressing day of the year my bollocks.

Y’know reporting this sort of shit in the absence of reporting some very bad news regarding share prices of certain things, and what that actually means, may make it the most depressing news day of the year. There are things going on in the financial world that will likely affect you more than the weather and the time of the year. It’s either self-censorship, like I’m doing, or that they’ve decided the morons in front of screens are bored of it.

So bollocks. I’m off away from blogging, back to my grim existential crisis brought on by how completely mental the world is. That and eat some toast.

Today Barrack Obama painted a wall blue in a homeless shelter. There is hope. That or I’m being sarcastic.

Tags: , ,

The New Capitalism

Robert Peston’s thoughts on the future of the world economy. PDF linked from the blog entry.

Tags: , , , ,

I’ve intermittently wanked on about the credit crunch for quite some time, in many ways it’s been like watching a railway crash, in that there’s been a fixed trajectory, and from a great distance things don’t appear to be moving that fast. I have a couple of comments; firstly, none of the underlying problems with the affected economies have been solved *, and secondly, there aren’t half some head cases that comment on Robert Peston’s blog. I haven’t blogged about anything financial or economic because it depresses the living fuck out of me (plus typing fucks my back). I have kept up with the situation, and, as a part of that, I’ve read RP’s blog. It’s good. I think RP is a credit to the BBC.  As for Robert Peston having a political bias – bollocks – he’s pissed people off of all stripes, which is an indicator of how good he is.

There are a lot of people who are sane enough to type their mad ideas (how would I know if I was one of them?), and it appears they’re attracted to Robert Peston’s blog like nutters to church. If you’ve got a few minutes you must have a chuckle at the comments on this post. Some of them go from fat-cats to socialist apocalypse faster than Hackney carriage drivers.

* I think there’s a 50/50 chance this will turn into an aggregate cluster fuck rather than a mere cluster fuck. Oh yeah – and nobody has mentioned the affect St Barack’s election in the US has had on British government tax policy, and/or speculated about what that indicates with upcoming US fiscal policy. I suspect the broad direction of fiscal policy was informally discussed well in advance at a well publicised visit to the UK. Lol.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Sometimes it is necessary to be simplistic.

£400,000,000,000

400 billion pounds is a conservative estimate of UK government money going to help troubled financial institutions.

$690,565,489,736.23

At $1.72641 per pound. The current exchange rate. Roughly $690 billion.

60,943,912

Population of the United Kingdom from the CIA World Factbook (July 2008 estimate).

£6563.41

Price per man, woman, and child, in the UK

$11331.14

Price per man, woman, and child, in the UK at $1.72641.

$700,000,000,000

A figure put forward by the US Federal Reserve in a package to rescue troubled financial organisations.

£405,465,677,330

That figure in the Great British Pound.

303,824,640

Population of the United States of America from the CIA World Factbook (July 2008 estimate).

$2304

Price per man, woman, and child, in the United States.

£1334.54

Price per man, woman, and child in the United States in the Great British Pound.

Tags: , , , ,

Unbelievable

The banks that are going to be bailed out by the US taxpayer are going to profit, possibly substantially, from the big bail-out.  Not US taxpayers.  They get all of the risk though.  Specifically from the ludicrously nebulous ‘reverse auction’ that talks in terms of ‘hold to maturity prices’.  This is simultaneously unbelievably funny and scary all at the same time.  I had a chance to watch most of the US senate hearing today and as far as I can tell it’s more of the same thinking that got us all in this mess in the first place. From and by the same people that got us in this mess.

No doubt people will swallow this shit and the ‘hold to maturity prices’ issue will not be addressed by any of the presidential candidates.  Stunningly. mindblowingly, unbelievable.

Robert Peston’s take.

Edit @ 2:32

The more I think about it this may actually be a good plan, with the proviso that the estimated matured prices are a fair representation.  E.g. the prices are what you’d expect for matured dodgy debt and not what you’d expect from vanilla debt.  That could end up costing less than the alternatives.  It was a shame it was so vague.

I for one hope that whatever happens it happens quickly and puts some kind of end to the present turmoil.

Tags: , ,

This makes me angry.   The BBC has some really good people, including Robert Peston, so when they talk complete bollocks re: oil prices they’ve got no excuse. Here’s what the BBC has to say about today’s spike in oil prices (believe it or not the biggest spike took place in the space of five minutes!) Keep in mind all commodities are up, not just oil:

Record one-day jump in oil price

The price of oil has jumped by more than $16 to $120.92 a barrel, the biggest one-day gain on record.

The increase in the price of US light, sweet crude was driven by concerns about supply.

Production in the Gulf of Mexico is still affected by Hurricane Ike and Saudi Arabia is cutting production.

Oil traders also believe that the US government’s bank bail-out plan will help the economy and therefore demand for oil.

Last week oil traded as low as $91 a barrel. It had fallen from its peak of $147 a barrel that it reached in July.

The volatility in the price has been exacerbated by the fact that the contract for the supply of oil in October expires on Monday.

From here (I’ve cut and pasted for the purposes of discussion and that the BBC has a tendency to edit articles days later).  In my opinion what they have written is unmitigated bullshit.

Here’s what Bloomberg had to say (I’ve cut and pasted for the purposes of discussion and commentary):

Oil Posts Biggest Gain as Traders Caught in End-Month Squeeze

By Mark Shenk

Sept. 22 (Bloomberg) — Crude oil climbed more than $25 a barrel, the biggest gain ever, as traders scrambled to unwind positions on the October contract’s last day of trading. The more-active November contract rose $6.62.

“This looks like a squeeze play,” said Phil Flynn, senior trader at Alaron Trading Corp. in Chicago. “All of the contracts are up, but nothing like October. This is the last day of trading and someone is scrambling to guarantee supply.”

Crude oil for October delivery rose $16.37, or 17 percent, to settle at $120.92 a barrel at 2:46 p.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It was the highest settlement price since Aug. 21. Futures for November delivery rose 6.4 percent to settle at $109.37 a barrel.

Prices climbed today as traders who sold the October contract last week, when oil dipped close to $90, had to buy the futures back. In a squeeze a trader has gone short by selling contracts hoping the price will decline. In the last days before the contract expires the trader must buy back the same number of futures or be forced to deliver the underlying oil.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that’s the indication of a huge squeeze,” said Craig Pirrong, director of energy markets for the University of Houston’s Global Energy Management Institute. “It’s just stunning this could happen” given the recent scrutiny in Congress and among U.S. regulators concerning the crude oil markets, he said.

`Yawning Gap’

“It’s a very small pool playing in this market right now, and that’s why you’re seeing those massive differentials” between the October and November contracts, said David Kirsch, an energy markets analyst at PFC Energy in Washington. “Somebody did place a wrong bet and is trying to cover that position.”

“The overarching factor is that the October futures contract expires today,” said Ryan Oatman, an analyst at SunTrust Robinson Humphrey in Houston. “This is a classic short squeeze. What lead up to it was a strong euro, up on concerns U.S. government actions will ultimately result in a greater budget deficit, higher inflation and a weaker dollar.”

Investors looking to hedge against the dollar’s decline earlier this year have helped lead oil, gold, corn and gasoline to records. Oil rose as high as $130 a barrel, up from $104.55 on Sept. 19, as the dollar dropped on concern that a U.S. proposal to buy $700 billion of troubled assets from financial firms will deepen the budget deficit.

The dollar declined 2.4 percent to $1.4817 per euro, from $1.4466 on Sept. 19. It touched $1.4818, the weakest level since Aug. 22.

Hard Assets

“Gold, silver, oil, copper, just about any hard asset, is looking good at this point,” said Michael Fitzpatrick, vice president for energy risk management at MF Global Ltd. in New York. “With the dollar down and stocks getting hit, commodities look like a safe play.”

Oil has risen 33 percent since Sept. 16 as lawmakers pledged fast consideration of the Treasury’s plan to buy devalued mortgage-related securities.

“There’s a flight to quality and the energy markets are benefiting,” said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy & Economic Research in Winchester, Massachusetts. “The dollar is down again and investors are fleeing to commodities. We are back to the cycle that pushed prices to records earlier this year.”

Hedge-fund managers and other large speculators increased their net-long position in New York crude-oil futures in the week ended Sept. 16, according to U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission data.

Speculative long positions, or bets prices will rise, outnumbered short positions by 19,379 contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange, the Washington-based commission said in its Commitments of Traders report.

Gasoline

Gasoline for October delivery increased 10.41 cents, or 4 percent, to settle at $2.7038 a gallon in New York. Heating oil rose 14.52 cents, or 5 percent, to settle at $3.043, the biggest single-session gain since June 6.

Regular gasoline, averaged nationwide, declined 1.8 cents to $3.739 a gallon, AAA, the nation’s largest motorist organization, said today on its Web site. Pump prices reached a record $4.114 a gallon on July 17.

Crude oil prices are “too high” because the global economic slowdown may spread and cut consumption, the International Energy Agency’s deputy executive director said.

“The economic slowdown in the U.S., Europe hasn’t gotten into China, India much, but at some point you have to presume it will,” William Ramsay said in an interview in Bangkok today.

The Paris-based IEA, which advises 27 developed nations on energy policy, was set up in 1974 in response to the Arab oil embargo.

Brent crude oil for November settlement rose $6.43, or 6.5 percent, to settle at $106.04 a barrel on London’s ICE Futures Europe exchange.

From here.

Who do you think gives a better idea of what happened today?  The BBC or Bloomberg?

Tags: , , , , ,

Commodity prices

This could be bollocks.  I’m no expert.

The price of oil has jumped today and will continue to rise.  If you remember a while back this year lots of people were talking about how supply and demand was responsible for rising oil prices.  It’s not difficult to find them.  Do a Google search.  There were serious editorials about peak oil, how little had been invested in infrastructure, Chinese demand etc. etc.   The oil demand situation between last Friday and today has not changed.  Yet prices are going up and will continue to do so.  Demand is going to go down.  All commodities are going to go up.  They are going to go up because the Dollar is going to go down and equities are volatile. It will affect inflation as much as a devalued Dollar.

Tags: , , ,

Take a look at the following chart here (via Index Explorer) market cap on loan percentage is an indicator of how much short selling is going on.  People have noticed, here’s FT.com’s Alphaville, and, with all of that in mind, why not browse today’s front pages here?

There are very few people asking if there will be any unintended (or blindingly obvious *cough* inflation) consequences from all this.

Tags: , , , , ,

I’m no fan of the Labour Party.  I’ve gone into why in the past and won’t bore you.

The present problems with certain UK banks are not the fault of the UK government.  The reasons are quite abstract, but can be summarised by a loss of trust in the US banking system, precipitated by the problems with complex repackaging and selling of debt in the last 9 years.  (It started under Clinton, so it’s not entirely a Bush problem – although the unchecked free market policies of his government have played a large part).  The failure of Northern Rock would not have happened, despite widespread over-lending in the mortgage market, without the backdrop of the so-called ‘credit-crunch’.   UK government policy, and Gordon Brown, are not to blame.

Likewise short sellers are not responsible for the situation.  Short selling has been better explained by the likes of Robert Peston, but it’s essentially borrowing an asset, selling it at market price, buying it back at a lower price, and giving it back to whoever you borrowed it from.  That way you profit from falls in the stock market.  Of course, if the price goes up, you end up losing money.  It’s not risk free – by any means.  Short sellers can only profit when prices are falling.  The only potential abuse is traders breaking the law and spreading false rumours.  That isn’t happening.  Short sellers are an easy scapegoat. Alastair Darling (chancellor of the exchequer), Alex Salmond (Scottish nationalist leader), and Vincent Cable (an irrelevance) have attributed blame to short sellers.   They’re talking out of their arses.

The only thing they’re right in saying is that short sellers make the situation worse.  But they’re a symptom, rather than a cause, despite what politicians say.  This armchair economist is somewhat in favour of some kind of rules to limit short selling in these kinds of situations.  It’ll be difficult to do though because it’s international.   It’s going to get worse before it gets better.

Tags: , ,

« Older entries