<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Twonilblankblank &#187; digital television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twonilblankblank.com/tag/digital-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twonilblankblank.com</link>
	<description>Every RPG I have ever played is a lie</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Pointing a camera at the TV results in crap video</title>
		<link>http://www.twonilblankblank.com/2008/01/05/pointing-a-camera-at-the-tv-results-in-crap-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.twonilblankblank.com/2008/01/05/pointing-a-camera-at-the-tv-results-in-crap-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The other]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thought of the day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[celebrity news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[totd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twonilblankblank.com/2008/01/05/pointing-a-camera-at-the-tv-results-in-crap-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t get people who upload copyrighted clips to YouTube by pointing a video camera at their television and re-recording the material.   The legal position is similar to someone who covertly records a film in a cinema.  The law is stupid, however, attempting to circumvent it by recording from a camera pointing at a television [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get people who upload copyrighted clips to YouTube by pointing a video camera at their television and re-recording the material.   The legal position is similar to someone who covertly records a film in a cinema.  The law is stupid, however, attempting to circumvent it by recording from a camera pointing at a television is also stupid.<br />
<strong><br />
Thought of the day</strong></p>
<p>Celebrity news is thought to attract viewers.  Does it represent a net gain in viewers, or temporary gains?    How loyal is an audience attracted by the saga of Britney Spears?  Can main-stream news channels compete with dedicated celebrity news outlets?  Has diversification in the name of popularity increased or decreased viewing figures for all channels that have gone down that route?  Is there an niche for news channels that  provide quality analysis of important news?  Is it possible to diversify to the point that what distinguishes a news channel is gone?  Do <a href="http://perezhilton.com/" target="_blank">Perez Hilton</a> and <a href="http://www.tmz.com/" target="_blank">TMZ</a> do a better job at covering the minutiae of celebrity news than CNN or the BBC?  What happens when they, and entities like Heat Magazine, get their own digital television channels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.twonilblankblank.com/2008/01/05/pointing-a-camera-at-the-tv-results-in-crap-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.276 seconds -->
